Designer Weebly Themes weebly review wix review squarespace review jimdo review
LAS VEGAS EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESIDENCY
LasVegasEMR
  • HOME
  • PROGRAM
    • Curriculae >
      • Clinical
      • Didactic
      • Orientation
    • Applicants/Students >
      • Medical Students
      • Interview Info
      • Active Duty Military Applicants
    • Research >
      • Current Research
      • Research Assistants
    • Ultrasound >
      • Ultrasound Resources
    • Nuts and Bolts
    • Where We Live >
      • Las Vegas
      • Southern Nevada
  • DEPARTMENT
    • UMC Adult ED
    • UMC Pediatric ED
    • UMC Trauma ED
    • Other Sites
  • PEOPLE
    • Faculty
    • Residents >
      • PGY-1
      • PGY-2
      • PGY-3
      • Alumni (Click for Map) >
        • Class of 2018
        • Class of 2017
        • Class of 2016
        • Class of 2015
        • Class of 2014
        • Class of 2013
      • Resident Life
  • SERVICE
    • Event Medicine
    • Tactical Medicine
    • Wilderness Medicine
    • EMS
    • Ski Patrol
  • FOAM Blog
  • INTRANET
    • Academic Calendar
    • Departmental Intranet >
      • Picture Archive
      • Conference Resources
    • Rotating Residents
  • Faculty
  • Research Assistants

F.O.A.M. BLOG

Las Vegas FOAM Blog is dedicated to sharing cutting edge learning with anyone, anywhere, anytime.  We hope to inspire discussion, challenge dogma, and keep readers up to date on the latest in emergency medicine. This site is managed by the residents of Las Vegas’ Emergency Medicine Residency program and we are committed to promoting the FOAMed movement.

Alternative Peripheral Venous Access Methods

8/11/2014

0 Comments

 
By Meaghan Mercer, DO
Emergency Medicine Resident


The nurse presents to the bedside and tells you intravenous (IV) access cannot be obtained on your patient and after attempt is made to place external jugular or ultrasound (US) guided access in the upper extremity frustration ensues. In IV drug abusers, significant peripheral edema, or patients who need multiple access points this can be a dilemma. In stable patients who do not need definitive central venous catheters (CVC) such as a triple lumen this can be frustrating. Central lines increase hospital acquired infections, come with procedural risks, and should not be inserted unless absolutely necessary. Here are a few options to explore. 

Interosseous Lines
IO access provides quick and effective access, however like other quick access lines, they are only supposed to be in place for 24 hours and are a temporary solution. In patients who need emergent access, this is a phenomenal option. IO lines allow for infiltration of life saving medication in minutes. 

In patients who need IV access but who are not in a life threatening situation advocating for this access option can be difficult. Pain with IO insertion and infusion in conscious patients is a complication. One study found the mean pain level in patients increased from 3.5 on insertion to 5.5 on infusion (1). Best bets looked at local anaesthetics in intraosseous access concluded that injecting lidocaine both before and after flushing an intraosseous needle is an effective method of reducing the pain of fluid infusion via this route (2,3,4). Other barriers are patient’s perception to having a line drilled into their tibia or humerus. In the few patients that have allowed me to perform an awake IO placement, discussing studies that state that the pain is equivalent to having an IV placed does not placate their fears and patients have experienced significant pain & discomfort. Many of the studies that discuss pain level have been done on healthy adult volunteers and not in ED patients, which also makes their application more difficult in the practical setting. 

Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IJ
Physicians at Highland Hospital in Oakland propose another option; the ultrasound guided peripheral internal jugular (PIJ) access (5). This study looked at nine patients that had PIJ lines placed by senior emergency medicine residents. They practiced typical sterile technique by cleaning the skin with chlorhexidine, wore sterile gloves, a mask, and used a sterile ultrasound probe cover. Using US guidance they placed an angiocatheter (18-gauge 2 ½-inchs) and confirmed placement with the return of dark venous blood. Two patients were lost to follow up, but there were no complications in the other seven patients in their study. 

This study discussed that the positives of a PIJ line include time to placement, operator safety, and less risk conferred to the patient. Authors did not recommend this line as a definitive access. The authors of the study discussed four potential drawbacks to this option: 1) lack of long term access 2) Risk of spontaneous migration 3) possible elimination of a site for CVC access 4) Carotid artery puncture/pneumothorax/hematoma formation. 

In EM literature of Note’s commentary about this article there was some strong opinions and critiques (6).  Scott Weingart (EM:CRIT) advocated that we should be considering more permanent access and be placing mid-level lines similar to PICCs with seldinger placement of mid-length catheters. Others discussed that theoretically the risk of infection should be correlated to the length of the catheter and that the vein used is not relevant- Jon Purcell commented “all veins are created equal; unless perhaps the distance to the heart has a role, which seems a bit ludicrous that that could appreciably alter the rate of infection”. http://www.emlitofnote.com/2012/07/the-peripheral-ij.html

We advocate that there need to be more studies done on this procedure and we are disappointed to not see additional data on this over the last two years. Here at Las Vegas EM a few of many of us have tried this technique, found it very useful, and use it fairly often. We have seen success with this procedure in a multitude of patients including a chronic IV drug abuse patient with cellulitis that needed IV access for antibiotics prior to discharge and a patient that was ICU bound with one good access point but our ICU requires two lines prior to acceptance to the floor. Intuitively, with a lack of evidence, this looks like a good alternative. 

Our Thoughts
PIJs will come with the same risks that are associated with attempted cannulation of veins in the arm: local infiltration, cellulitis, hematoma formation and thrombo-phlebitis (7). It has also been documented that arterial puncture occurs ~2% of the time when attempting to cannulate the deeper veins of the arm via ultrasound guidance (8). When deciding between a CVC and a PIJ an 18-guage needle has less risk of trauma and hematoma formation when compared to a 14-guage central venous catheter.

Impact on Emergency Medicine
With a shorter angiocatheter infection rates should be equivalent or less. This line can be quickly and easily placed with an operator who already is experienced with US guided CVC. Especially with potentially dischargeable patients this is an alternative to CVC or IO placement. In patients who have one access point but need an additional due to placement requirements this is a good bridge to PICC placement. As with all procedures, especially those that have not be vetted by evidence based medicine, a discussion of potential risks, benefits, and alternatives should always occur. 

We would love to hear your thoughts, successes, and failures on this procedure and to find out if it is becoming common practice and we just haven’t heard about it in the literature. 

References
  1. Fowler RL, Pierce A, Nazeer S, et al. 1,199 case series: Powered intraosseous insertion provides safe and effective vascular access for emergency patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(Suppl4):152.
  2. Stewart M. Local anaesthetics in intraosseous access. Best Bets. July 2013. http://bestbets.org/bets/bet.php?id=2515.
  3. Philbeck TE, Miller L, Montez D. Pain management during intraosseous infusion through the proximal humerus. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:S128.
  4. Philbeck TE, Miller LJ, Montez D, et al. Hurts so good. Easing IO pain and pressure. J Emerg Med Serv 2010;35:58–62.
  5. Philbeck TE, Miller LJ, Montez D, et al. Hurts so good. Easing IO pain and pressure. J Emerg Med Serv 2010;35:58–62.
  6. Radecki R. “The “Periferal” IJ”: Emergency Medicine Literature of Note. 31 July, 2102. http://www.emlitofnote.com/2012/07/the-peripheral-ij.html
  7. Kagel EM, Rayan GM. Intravenous catheter complications in the hand and forearm. Journal of Trauma. 2004;56(1):123-7.
  8.  Keyes L, Frazee B, Snoey E, Simon B, Christy D. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in the emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1999;34:711-4.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Las Vegas EM 
    FOAM Blog

    A FREE AND OPEN-ACCESS MEDICAL EDUCATION BLOG BY THE RESIDENTS AND FACULTY OF  LasVegasEM. 

    The information contained in this blog is for educational puposes only and is not intended to advocate specific medical practices. All opinions are our own and do not imply endorsement by our hospital or school of medicine. Any reference to patients has been redacted or intentionally altered to make identification impossible. 

    READ FULL LEGAL DISCLAIMERS

    Picture
    Free LVEM Lecture Videos

    Archives

    November 2018
    June 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    #FOAMed
    #vegasfoamblog

    RSS Feed

CONTACT US


UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS
DEPT. OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
901 RANCHO LANE, STE 135
LAS VEGAS, NV 89106


PH:      702.383.7885
FAX:   702.366.8545


EMERGENCYMEDICINELV@GMAIL.COM


Picture

QUICK LINKS


RESIDENCY

DEPARTMENT
FACULTY
RESIDENTS
STUDENTS

F.O.A.M.
INTRANET


WWW.LASVEGASEMR.COM


LasVegasEMR.com is neither owned nor operated by the University of Nevada School of Medicine (UNSOM). It is financed and managed independently by a group of emergency physicians. This website is not supported financially, technically, or otherwise by UNSOM nor by any other governmental entity. The affiliation with UNSOM and the UNSOM logo does not imply endorsement or approval of the content contained on these pages.
©LasVegasEMR physicians READ FULL LEGAL DISCLAIMERS
Design by DivTag Weebly Templates
Proudly powered by Weebly